A regional clinical audit of the provision of adjuvant systemic anti-cancer treatment following lung cancer resection in eligible patients across Greater Manchester to support national benchmarking

Introduction: Adjuvant anti-cancer systemic therapy (SACT) following lung resection improves overall survival in stage II/II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) National Specialty Report for Lung Cancer recommends centres publish adjuvant SACT rates for National benchmarking and proposes a target of >40% of eligible patients undergo SACT. We report a regional audit into the uptake of adjuvant SACT in Greater Manchester (GM). Method(s): A retrospective case review of all patients undergoing curative-intent NSCLC surgery with a pathological stage of II/III from 01/01/21 to 30/04/21. Data collected included patient demographics, uptake of adjuvant SACT, reasons for no adjuvant SACT and tolerance and complications of SACT. Result(s): 58 patients underwent surgical resection within the audit period and were eligible for adjuvant SACT. Median age was 70 years (range 45 - 81) and 60% were female. 47% (27/58) commenced adjuvant SACT;41% (24/58) were treated with chemotherapy and 7% (4/58) were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. 58% (14/24) of patients that commenced adjuvant chemotherapy completed 4 cycles. Carboplatin/Vinorelbine was the commonest regimen (82%, 18/22). There were no grade III-V complications and no chemotherapy-related deaths. Dose reduction due to toxicity was required in 14% (3/22). The reasons adjuvant systemic therapy was not given were patient choice in 32% (10/31), poor physical health such that risks outweighed benefits in 42% (13/31), and other reasons (e.g. need to treat synchronous primary tumours) in 26% (8/31). COVID-19 was not recorded as a cause for adjuvant omission/ dose reduction. Conclusion(s): This data provides national benchmarking information for adjuvant SACT in NSCLC and suggests the target of >40% is achievable and appropriate. Interventions that improve patient fitness pre- and post-operatively might increase adjuvant SACT uptake. This regional audit will be extended to review all eligible patients in 2021 and further data will be presented. Disclosure: No significant relationships.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

Deviation from standard cancer treatment during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India: A cross-sectional study

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, established best practices in cancer care were modified to diminish the risk of COVID-19 infection among patients and health-care workers. Objective(s): We aimed to study the modifications in cancer-directed therapy during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Material(s) and Method(s): A cross-sectional study of patients with cancers of the head and neck, thoracic, urologic, and central nervous systems who visited the medical oncology department of the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, between April 22, 2020 and June 01, 2020, was conducted. Data were prospectively collected in an online pro forma and supplemented from the electronic medical records. Result(s): Of a total of 514 patients, 363 (71%) were men. The most common malignancy was lung cancer in 234 patients (46%). Cancer-directed therapy was modified in 83 patients (16%). Deviations consisted of modification of the chemotherapy regimen (48%), temporary discontinuation of chemotherapy in 37%, and interim chemotherapy to delay surgery in 5%. Changes in the chemotherapy regimen included a shift to a less intensive regimen in 45%, changing from intravenous to oral in 40%, and less frequent dosing of immunotherapy in 7%. Considering missed appointments as a deviation from planned cancer therapy, 68% of patients had a deviation in the standard planned cancer care. Conclusion(s): Almost two-thirds of the patients could not reach the hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in India. Of those who could reach the hospital, one of out every six patients with cancer had a change in their cancer-directed treatment, half of which consisted of a modification in the standard chemotherapy regimens. The effects of these therapy deviations are likely to be long-lasting. (Clinical Trials Registry-India, CTRI/2020/07/026533).Copyright © 2023 Neurology India, Neurological Society of India Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Unfavorable Complication of Achalasia

Introduction: Achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagus characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and loss of peristalsis in the distal esophagus. It is a rare condition with an annual incidence of 0.5-1.2 per 100,000 individuals. The etiology of primary achalasia is unknown, however secondary achalasia can be attributed to malignancy, infections or systemic diseases such as amyloidosis. An infrequent complication of achalasia is esophageal squamous cell carcinoma which has a prevalence of 26 in every 1,000 cases. We present a case of interval locoregionally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma only 2 years after a normal upper endoscopy. Case Description/Methods: A 67-year-old female with known achalasia and previous pneumatic dilation in her 30s presented to our outpatient clinic in 2019 with complaints of worsening chronic dysphagia. EGD was performed which revealed a significantly dilated esophagus with candida esophagitis. Despite completing antifungal therapy, she continued to experience dysphagia to solids and liquids. Barium swallow demonstrated absent peristalsis with pooling of contrast within the esophagus. High-Resolution Manometry testing demonstrated absent peristalsis. She opted for surgical myotomy, however due to COVID restrictions, the procedure was delayed. Repeat EGD was performed in 2022 for pre-surgical evaluation and showed a large obstructing friable esophageal mass in the lower third of the esophagus. Pathology was consistent with invasive poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. PET scan showed locoregional disease with FDG-avid esophageal and gastrohepatic node lesions. She was started on chemoradiation with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin (Figure). Discussion(s): The risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in achalasia has significantly increased with incidence of approximately 1 in 300 patients. The presumed mechanism of malignancy in achalasia is poor emptying resulting in food stasis, bacterial overgrowth and inflammation leading to dysplasia and development of carcinoma. Given the relatively low incidence, there are currently no guidelines on routine endoscopic screening to assess for malignancy in patients with achalasia. Survival rates are poor as patients are often diagnosed at advanced stages. This case aims to illustrate the importance and need for interval screening in individuals with long standing achalasia to improve outcomes.

A retrospective review of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for patients with genitourinary malignancies receiving chemotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for the future

Background: To mitigate the risks of chemotherapy associated neutropenia, during the COVID-19 pandemic, all genitourinary (GU) cancer patients treated with chemotherapy at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PMCC) were offered primary prophylaxis with GCSF. We hypothesize that this reduced rates of febrile neutropenia, hospitalizations, healthcare costs and improved overall outcomes, compared to GU cancer patients treated with chemotherapy without GCSF in the 2 years prior to the pandemic. Method(s): We performed a retrospective review of GU cancer patients, receiving curative or palliative intent chemotherapy, with or without primary GCSF prophylaxis between January 2018 and June 2022. GCSF was given either as a single dose or as consecutive doses post chemotherapy. Main outcomes were incidence of febrile neutropenia, hospitalization, health care expenditures as well as disease specific outcomes. Result(s): Overall, 248 patients with prostate cancer (44%), urothelial cancers (33%) germ cell (21%), and rare GU cancers (4%) were identified. Median age was 70 (range 19-91), 92% were male, 65% were ECOG 0/1. Treatment intent was neoadjuvant (13%), adjuvant (20%), or palliative (67%). Main regimens used were docetaxel, cabazitaxel, carboplatin, cisplatin/ etoposide, gemcitabine/cisplatin and BEP. Median follow-up was 10.5 months (0.23-52.3 months). A total of 206/248 received primary GCSF prophylaxis. During chemotherapy, the median white blood cell levels were higher in the GCSF group compared to the non-GCSF group (14.1+/-10+/-9/L vs 2.90+/-10+/-9/L, p<0.0001);and neutropenia rates were markedly lower (2% vs. 93%, P=,0.0001). Hospital admission rates were significantly lower in G-CSF users compared to nonusers (19% vs. 69%, P,0.0001). Symptomatic disease progression 13% was the leading cause of admission in the G-CSF group. Infectious causes such as UTI, pneumonia, COVID-19, and sepsis were seen in only 12% of the G-CSF group compared to 31% in the non-users. G-CSF was generally well tolerated with just 0.97% discontinuing G-CSF. Conclusion(s): During the COVID-19 pandemic, primary prophylactic G-CSF use in GU cancer patients, undergoing chemotherapy significantly lowered rates of both febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations and could be a cost-effective strategy in this patient population that warrants further study.

Neoadyuvant Treatment in the Covid Era

Since Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared pandemic in March 2020, there have been 545.226.550 cases up to 4 July 2022 (1). Several studies concluded that patients (pts) with cancer are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection, morbidity and mortality. Those undergoing neoadyuvant treatment are at particularly risk of disease progression if chemotherapy or surgery are delayed. Also, is known that a higher NLR (neutrophil to limphocyte ratio) is related to worse outcomes (3). Our hospital is located at the Northwest of Spain and in the last months we noticed a never seen number of infections in cancer population. The aim of this study is to evaluate the severity of COVID19 and its impact on chemotherapy and surgery delay in pts undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy breast cancer. METHOD(S): We conducted a ambispective, unicenter, observational study of breast cancer pts, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, between March 2020 and May 2022 at University Hospital A Coruna (Spain). We analyzed type of infection, need of hospitalization, chemotherapy and surgical delay, and its association with tumor type;BRCA germline mutation;clinical stage;treatment;vaccination status;and neutrophils, lymphocytes, and NLR before COVID-19 disease. RESULT(S): During the study period, from 1 March 2020 to 31 May 2022, 183 pts underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 23 (12.5%) pts experienced COVID-19 infection, of which 21 were diagnosed between January and May 2022. The median age was 47,91 years [range 33 - 69 years]. Luminal B HER 2 negative comprised the most common molecular subtype (40.9%), followed by Triple Negative (36.4%), Luminal B HER 2 positive (13.6%), and HER 2 enriched (9.1%). Germline mutations in BRCA account for 13.6% pts. At diagnosis, 4.5%, 72.7%, and 22.7% had stages I, II, and III respectively. Chemotherapy treatments included: paclitaxel followed by AdryamicineCyclophosphamide (AC) (45.4%);carboplatin - paclitaxel - trastuzumab - pertuzumab (18,2%);carboplatin - paclitaxel followed by AC (18,2%);KEYNOTE-756: pembrolizumab/placebo - paclitaxel followed by AC (13.7%);and paclitaxel - trastuzumab - pertuzumab followed by myocet - cyclophosphamide - trastuzumab - pertuzumab (4.5%). The association of G-CSF ocurred in 9 pts (40.9%). 22 pts were fully vaccinated, 8 pts (36.4%) with two doses and 13 pts (59.1%) with three doses. 77.3% pts experienced mild respiratory symptoms with 9.1% hospitalizations. The median duration of delays was 15 days for chemotherapy and 29,58 days for surgery. NLR percentil 25 was associated with COVID-19 type of infection. For those pts with a lower rate, infection was asymptomatic and for those with a higher rate symptoms were moderate (X2= 5,119, p = 0,024). CONCLUSION(S): COVID-19 disease become a high prevalent infection in pts undergoing neoadjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. Most pts are fully vaccinated and experienced an indolent infection. NLR is an easily measurable and cost-effective parameter that could be useful as a prognostic marker of severity in COVID-19. We will continue to follow-up these pts to see the impact of chemotherapy or surgery delay in pathological complete response and disease-free survival until the congress in December 2022.

Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary to the Right Ventriclea Rare Cause of Acute Heart Failure

Background Large autopsy studies have shown intracardiac metastases in 15% of patients with disseminated cancer. We present a rare case of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the heart with unknown primary. Case 55-year-old female with DVT, COVID-19 infection and stage IV metastatic SCC of uncertain origin presented with progressive fatigue and dyspnea. She had occlusion of left interlobar pulmonary artery and new large right ventricle (RV) mass consistent with tumor and thrombus invasion. Systemic anticoagulation was initiated. Decision-making Echocardiography showed a large mass in RV measuring 5 cm x 2.5 cm and occupying most of the RV cavity. Though her RV systolic function was reduced, she was unlikely to benefit from surgical resection due to disseminated disease. Piecemeal removal of RV mass alleviated the obstructed RV outflow tract. Histopathology featured squamous cell carcinoma. She had symptom resolution within a week following procedure. The patient was discharged home with oral anticoagulant. On follow up, she had not experienced any worsening of symptoms and changes in RV mass size despite compliance with chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) and anticoagulation. Conclusion Metastatic SCC with unknown primary is a rare cause of acute heart failure that highlights the interplay between clinical findings and multimodal cardiac diagnostic imaging. An individualized approach is required for patients, balancing both risks of surgical and percutaneous intervention. [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation

Cancer, Covid and Control of Ra - a Toxic Combination?

Case report - Introduction: This case highlights the dilemma of keeping rheumatoid arthritis disease under control in active cancer cases and establishing a consistent multidisciplinary dialogue during a pandemic and staffing crises. During chemotherapy and active cancer treatment, disease-modifying therapies (conventional and biologic) are often stopped. In some cases, the potential benefits versus risks of restarting usual therapies have to be balanced against risks of suppressing disease activity with highdose steroids. Risks of infection (common and atypical) need to be considered. Case report - Case description: A is a 67-year-old female nonsmoker diagnosed with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RF, anti - CCP positive) in 2008. Other conditions include type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation (on warfarin), hypothyroidism and obstructive sleep apnoea. Due to active disease, despite triple therapy (methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine), anti-TNF therapy (etanercept) commenced in 2009 with primary non-response. However, she responded well to B-cell therapy (rituximab) in conjunction with oral methotrexate (25mg weekly) receiving annual infusions from 2010 to 2016. In 2017, an elective sleeve gastrectomy procedure for high BMI was abandoned after peritoneal deposits of concern were noted. Histology and CT imaging were consistent with a primary peritoneal malignancy (Stage 3c low-grade serous adenocarcinoma). Treatment involved debulking surgery (total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpinoophorectomy, omentectomy) and tamoxifen. Treatment for rheumatoid arthritis stalled during this period but as frequent steroids were required for active joint inflammation, in agreement with the oncologists, she had a rituximab cycle in 2018. Unfortunately, in 2019 she had signs of cancer progression (elevated tumour markers, CT imaging) and has subsequently started carboplatin chemotherapy. She has been unable to continue methotrexate or rituximab pending completion of the chemotherapy cycles (ongoing). However, her arthritis is now uncontrolled without increased steroids. Due to recurrent flares, her maintenance dose has been increased from 5mg to 7.5-10mg prednisolone daily until we can establish if it is safe and appropriate to recommence her usual arthritis regime. Even without disease-modifying therapy like methotrexate and rituximab, risk of infection (including atypical ones) is still significant with the combination of chemotherapy and steroids. Risk of progressive joint damage and adverse quality of life with active arthritis also needs to be considered. Staffing crises, exacerbated by COVID pandemic issues, have added to complexity of decision making and coordination of regular multidisciplinary discussions regarding treatment. Case report - Discussion: Cancer is a known association in rheumatoid arthritis patients with a twofold higher risk of lymphoma compared to the general population. Whether condition or treatment affects risk remains unclear as immune dysregulation is relevant in both autoimmunity and cancer. Paraneoplastic, recent onset arthritis, chemotherapy- or immunotherapy-induced arthralgia/arthritis are also well documented. This case had a seropositive rheumatoid arthritis phenotype quite a few years prior to cancer diagnosis. Primary peritoneal cancer is uncommon, often presenting as in this case as an incidental finding. It is usually treated like ovarian cancer Whilst methotrexate has been implicated in lung cancer, melanoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, overall safety data suggest any risk is quite low (e.g., EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders usually resolve with drug discontinuation). It is also a known chemotherapeutic agent. Anti-TNF treatment algorithms generally exclude patients with recent cancer. Rituximab, originally developed as a cancer drug, is not thought to affect risk of cancer development or progression. Treatment with disease-modifying therapy (conventional and biologics) is often withheld in patients with active malignancy undergoing chemotherapy due to a theo etical risk of potentiated immunosuppression and toxicity, particularly cytopaenias. However, maintaining arthritis control with glucocorticoids also has short- and long-term risks. Combining chemotherapy agents like carboplatin with methotrexate has been used for urothelial carcinoma and can be well tolerated with close monitoring of haematological parameters. Thus, it could be argued this patient is at risk of infections whichever treatment approach is taken and regaining control of arthritis with recommencement of methotrexate and rituximab is much better for her quality of life. Regular multidisciplinary discussions are important to outline risks versus benefits of combined treatment. This may be difficult in practice during staffing crises. Covid risk in patients receiving rituximab and/or chemotherapy, timing and response to COVID vaccination are also important considerations. Case report - Key learning points: . Primary peritoneal cancer is uncommon and can present as an incidental finding . Whilst treatment for progressive cancer is important, withholding rheumatoid arthritis treatment can have a significant adverse impact on quality of life . Morbidity and mortality risks of stopping treatment versus combined treatment (cancer therapy and disease-modifying therapy) ideally needs to be fully discussed and agreed with the patient and all care providers - lack of "named" providers, restructuring, redeployment, multi-specialty care and a global pandemic can make coordination of this difficult.

Co-existence of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Sinonasal Mucormycosis: Therapeutical Challenges

Pandemic was new experience for entire humanity. Medical fraternity was no exception. The cases of mucormycosis were on the rise during the second wave of the pandemic. Presented here are two cases which were combination of two diseases, one of which was squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck region and other one was sinonasal mucormycosis. Both patients were diabetics and had history of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection in past. Our literature search doesn't reveal any previously reported cases of this rare combination. There were certain challenges in management. Both diseases were lethal and treatment of one cannot be prioritised over other. Challenges in managing those cases were, reconstruction planning, perioperative management and postsurgery adjuvant therapy. In absence of previous experience to treat this combination or any literature available new treatment protocol were formulated. Cases were discussed in multidisciplinary team meetings and treatment plans were formulated. Mucormycosis and oral squamous cell carcinoma both were operated and reconstructed in same sitting. In one patient revision endoscopic debridement had to be done. Amphotericin B was started once diagnosis was confirmed. Patients were followed-up on weekly basis during first month and imaging was done every 15 days. Both patients had satisfactory recovery without any sign of progression of mucormycosis. Adjuvant radiation was given in both cases at appropriate time. At follow-up both patients were free from disease for six months. From these unique experiences it can be recommended that combination of sinonasal mucormycosis and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck is very rare. Both diseases can be treated simultaneously. Excision and reconstruction can be done in single sitting. There is no need to delay or avoid adjuvant radiation. Multidisciplinary team approach is the key for treatment.

A Phase II Study of Metformin with Pemetrexed/Carboplatin in Patients with Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: There is a subset of NSCLC patients ineligible for benefit from TKIs/Immunotherapy (e.g. STK11 mutation conferring resistance to Immunotherapy). Besides, many patients cannot afford these therapies. Metformin has anticancer properties acting both on glycolytic metabolism and tumor microenvironment. In vitro studies suggest synergism between metformin and pemetrexed. STK11 deficient cell lines are more sensitive to metformin. Clinical studies combining metformin with chemotherapy are limited by small sample size. We conducted an exploratory phase-2 clinical trial of metformin with pemetrexed/carboplatin in advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: This was a single center, open label, single arm phase 2 clinical trial with a Simon’s two stage design. The null hypothesis was that the combination would not improve the 6-month PFS rate by 15%, from 50%. Treatment-naive, non-diabetic patients aged 18-75 years with NSCLC (adenocarcinoma/not-otherwise-specified) with stage IV disease having ECOG PS 0-2 with unmutated EGFR/ALK and without brain metastasis or with asymptomatic brain metastases were treated with pemetrexed-carboplatin chemotherapy and metformin for six months. The primary outcome was 6-month progression free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary outcomes were safety, overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), proportion of STK 11 mutation and effect of STK 11 mutation on 6-month PFS rate. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Targeted sequencing was attempted for available tissue specimens. Results: The first interim analysis was performed after enrollment of 26 patients for the first stage (before the target accrual of first stage was reached) due to slow accrual, in view of COVID pandemic. The study was terminated after first stage for futility. The median age of patients in the study was 52 years (range, 30 to 68) and 18 patients (69.0%) were males. Half of the patients had ECOG-PS 2. Brain metastases were present in eight (31%) patients and among these four (50%) were symptomatic at presentation. The median follow-up time was 25 months. The median PFS was four months. 6-month PFS rate was 28% (95% CI - 0.12 to 0.46). Of the 25 evaluable patients, five (20%) had a partial response, and eight (32%) had stable disease;13 (52%) of the patients had disease control. The median OS was 16 months. During combined therapy, 14 (54%) and 3 (11%) patients had any grade and grade 3 anemia respectively. One patient had grade 3 neutropenia. Among non-hematological toxicities, gastrointestinal toxicities (nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) were the most common. No grade 4 toxicities were reported. There were no treatment discontinuations, however treatment delay due to grade three toxicities was present in two patients. Dose modification for Metformin was required in four patients. Targeted Sequencing was possible in nine cases. Two of these patients had STK11 mutation and an associated bad outcome (PFS < 2 months). Conclusions: We could not demonstrate the benefit of combination of Metformin with pemetrexed-carboplatin in terms of improvement in 6-month PFS rate. The addition of metformin to pemetrexed-carboplatin has an acceptable safety profile. Future trials should test metformin in specific subsets (STK11 mutated) and in combination with immunotherapy and TKIs. Keywords: Metformin, NSCLC, STK11

Efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and gemcitabine dosed on day 1/day 8 versus day 1 alone for platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Background: Carboplatin, gemcitabine +/-bevacizumab is a preferred regimen for recurrent, platinumsensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC). A phase III trial established that the regimen of carboplatin on Day 1 (D1) and gemcitabine on D1 and Day 8 (D8) was associated with acceptable toxicity and improved progression free survival (PFS) compared to carboplatin alone. Treatment with gemcitabine on D8 incurs more exposure to cytotoxic therapy and increased burden on patients and the healthcare system, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is unknown whether D1/D8 gemcitabine imparts an improvement in efficacy compared to D1 alone. Our objective was to compare efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and gemcitabine D1/D8 (CG-D1/8) with a modified D1 regimen (CG-D1). Methods: A retrospective single-institution cohort study was performed in women with recurrent PSOC treated with carboplatin, gemcitabine +/-bevacizumab from 2009-2020. Data was analyzed by intention to treat comparing women who received CG-D1/8 vs CG-D1. Data was also analyzed by 3 groups: CG-D1/8 vs CG-D1/8 but dropped D8 vs CG-D1. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), defined as complete or partial response at 6 cycles or maximum cycles if <6. Secondary outcomes included PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity, Neulasta use and dose reduction. Results: Of 200 patients, 26% completed CGD1/ D8, 21.5% started CG-D1/D8 but dropped D8, and 52.5% received CG-D1. There were no significant differences in age, race, or ECOG between cohorts. Among CG-D1/D8, 45.3% dropped D8 primarily due to neutropenia (51.2%) or thrombocytopenia (30.2%). The RR at 6 cycles was 68.7% for CG-D1/8 completed, 70.7% for CG-D1/8 dropped D8, and 69.3% for CG-D1 (p=0.97). The median PFS was 13.1, 12.1 and 12.4 months for CG-D1/8 completed, CG-D1/8 dropped D8, and CG-D1, respectively (p=0.29). Similarly, median OS was 28.2, 33.5 and 34.3 months for the above groups respectively (p=0.42). While there was no difference in concurrent bevacizumab use for CG-D1/8 and CG-D1 (34.7% vs 29.5%, p=0.43), among the CG-D1/8 patients, a significantly higher proportion of patients who dropped D8 received bevacizumab (51.2% vs 21.2%, p=0.006). Table 1 lists secondary outcomes. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in RR, PFS or OS among women with PSOC receiving CG-D1/8 vs CG-D1, regardless of whether D8 was dropped. CG-D1/8 was associated with significantly greater hematologic toxicity. These findings suggest a modified D1 regimen may be a suitable alternative to standard CG-D1/8 treatment and warrant prospective validation.

Durvalumab (D) and PET-directed chemoradiation (CRT) after induction FOLFOX for esophageal adenocarcinoma: Final results

Background: Induction FOLFOX followed by PET-directed CRT prior to surgery demonstrated positive results in the CALGB 80803 study. We investigated the safety and efficacy of adding D, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, to PET-directed CRT. Methods: Patients (pts) with locally advanced esophageal/GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Pts received 2 cycles of mFOLFOX6 prior to repeat PET/CT. PET responders (≥35% reduction in SUV (PETr)) received 5-FU/capecitabine and oxaliplatin with RT to 50.4Gy, while induction PET non-responders (PETnr) received carboplatin/paclitaxel with RT. All Pts received D 1,500 mg q4W ×2 starting 2 weeks prior to CRT. Esophagectomy was planned 6-8 weeks after CRT. Pts with R0 resections received adjuvant D 1,500mg q4W ×6. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Results: 36 pts were enrolled. Clinical ≥T3 disease was seen in 32 pts (88.9%, cT4 = 3) and ≥N1 in 23 (63.9%) pts. PD-L1 CPS was ≥1 in 25 (71.4%) of 35 tested with 14 (40%) ≥5. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was identified in 3 (8.3%) pts. 25 (70%) pts were PETr. Preop treatment was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Three pts had disease progression prior to surgery. pCR was identified in 8 (22.2%) pts and 22 (64.7%) had major pathologic response (MPR;ypTanyN0 + ≥90% response). Those with MSI tumors had ≥90% treatment response (1 pCR, 1: ypT1aN0 99% response, 1: ypT2N0, 90% response). 17 (73.9%) of 23 cN+ pts had ypN0 disease. MPR was associated with PD-L1 ≥1 (p = 0.03) and with a higher tumor mutational burden (TMB;p = 0.016) on MSK-IMPACT testing. Adjuvant D was commenced in 27 pts, with a median number of 6 cycles. Early discontinuation was due to risks of visits due to COVID19 (4, 15%), progressive disease (3, 11%), late surgical complications (2, 7%) and immune toxicity (1, 4%). With a median follow-up of 30 months, OS rates were 92% [95%CI: 83%-100%] and 85 % [95%CI: 74%-98%] at 12 and 24 months post induction. 12 and 24-month PFS rates were 81% [95%CI: 69%-95%] and 71% [95%CI: 58%-88%] respectively. In the 33 operated pts, 12 and 24-month disease free survival was 82% [95%CI: 70%-96%] and 78% [95%CI: 65%-94%], respectively. In addition to SUV on PET, total lesion glycolysis (TLG) was correlated with pathologic response. In cases with borderline change in SUV, TLG could predict response to treatment. One PETnr with 30.8% reduction in SUV had 88.1% reduction in TLG and pCR. Conversely, a PETr (-36.3%) who had an increase in TLG (39.3%) had only 40% treatment response on pathology. Conclusions: The addition of D to induction FOLFOX and PETdirected CRT prior to surgery is safe and appears effective with a high rate of pathologic response, as well as encouraging survival data. PD-L1 CPS≥1 and higher TMB may be associated with MPR. TLG is a novel PET variable that should be studied prospectively. Additional correlatives and comparison to a cohort treated with standard PET-directed CRT will be presented.

Unusual Presentation of Pneumonic-Type Lung Adenocarcinoma and Diffuse Air-Space Consolidation

Introduction: Pneumonic-type lung adenocarcinoma (P-ADC) exhibits a pattern of lung cancer that is radiologically like pneumonia1. It may be misdiagnosed and represents a diagnostic challenge in the setting of progressive respiratory failure. We report a case of P-ADC which presented with rarely described extensive diffuse air-space consolidation. Case Presentation: This is a 74-year-old female with a history of Crohn's disease on Mesalamine, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia and former smoker of 40 pack years admitted to the ICU for hypoxic respiratory failure requiring 100% O2 via HFNC. Twenty-two months prior to admission the patient underwent an EBUS following abnormal low dose lung cancer screening CT (Figure 1A-B). The CT demonstrated left infrahilar consolidation and multiple ground-glass nodules. The EBUS with biopsy/brushings of the mass in addition to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were negative. She was lost to follow-up due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Two weeks prior to admission she was admitted for cough and dyspnea, treated for a community acquired pneumonia following CT showing excessive nodular opacities with left dense consolidations. On day of admission the patient presented from outpatient PFT with hypoxemia requiring 8LPM O2 and saturation of 90%, admitted to ICU on HFNC. Associated symptoms were recent unintentional 20 lbs weight loss and fatigue. CT imaging was remarkable for progressive, fulminant left lung consolidation and contralateral lung nodules (Figure 1C-D). The patient underwent a bedside bronchoscopy which showed normal anatomy and copious thin clear secretions. BAL samples showed malignant cells favouring nonsmall cell carcinoma. Further CT guided FNA showed the tumor cells were consistent with adenocarcinoma and positive for TTF1/Napsin A, negative for p40, and KRAS mutation detected. The patient was started on methylprednisolone, Carboplatin and Pemetrexad and discharged home on 6 LPM oxygen. The patient was shortly after re-admitted for a post obstructive pneumonia and progressive hypoxemic respiratory failure, she transitioned to hospice care and passed away during the hospitalization. Conclusion: P-ADC is uncommon and often misdiagnosed due to unusual presentation mimicking infectious and inflammatory diseases2. It is unclear whether P-ADC represents an extreme form, later stage, or entirely different entity of lung cancer and large airspace consolidations are rarely reported3. Lesions of pneumonia type that extend beyond one lobe on CT are associated with microscopy involvement of both lungs and pathologic correlation shows that CT is unable to reveal multifocality in a high percentage of cases which makes the extend of multifocal consolidations in this case rarely described4-6. (Figure Presented).

Longitudinal Extensive Transverse Myelitis:rare immunotherapy related adverse effect vs COVID19-related immunization complication

Objective: To report an acute presentation of long extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) in the setting of Atezolizumab monotherapy and COVID-19 mRNA immunization Background: Patients being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for advanced malignancy have an increased propensity of developing neuro-immune complications. With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic there have been reported cases of TM following COVID-19 immunization. The reported infrequency of TM with both aforementioned causes makes delineating the etiology challenging. Design/Methods: A 58-year-old male with metastatic SCLC completed 4 cycles of Atezolizumab, Carboplatin and Etoposide and was transitioned to Atezolizumab maintenance. He previously underwent Atezolizumab infusion and was administered the second dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine one day prior to developing acute lower extremity paralysis, sensory loss from chest down and overflow incontinence. MRI spine illustrated centromedullary enhancing lesions from C7-T7. CSF analysis showed 25 WBC, 116/uL RBC, 94 mg/dL protein, normal glucose, negative oligoclonal bands and normal IgG index. CSF bacterial and virology studies were negative. Additionally, serum anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) and antiaquaporin receptor 4 (AQP4) antibodies were unremarkable. Results: 5-day course of pulsed methylprednisolone followed by three therapeutic plasma exchanges produced minimal improvement in lower extremities strength and sensory level. Conclusions: This case demonstrates the complication and symptomatology of TM in the setting of anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody with the co-incidental COVID-19 mRNA vaccine administration. The causal relationship between the vaccine and TM is difficult to establish due to limited data and the presence of a known inciting factor but hints at a possible exaggeration of the existing neuroinflammatory process. Currently, CDC recommends that individuals who are moderately to severely immunocompromised receive an additional dose of an mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) at least 28 days after the completion of the initial mRNA COVID-19 vaccine series. Caution should be given for those patients who are on ICI therapy.

Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma-Treatment Failure, Recovery and COVID-19: A Case Report

Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of non Hodgkin lymphoma, involving multiple organ system including lymph node, bone marrow, spleen etc. Among overall cases of DLBCL, 40% are extranodal in origin and stomach being the most common site. While most of the (60%) are not diagnosed until the disease reach stage 3 or 4. While in the present case, patient had predominant involvement of neck lymph nodes. Following the final diagnosis, patient was given first line treatment in the form of Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin hydrochloride (doxorubicin hydrochloride), vincristine (Oncovin) and Prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen, to which patient didn’t respond and further the patient was given Rituximab, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (R-ICE)regimen, to which patient responded quickly. With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the patient encountered infection with its associated complication. The following case report is all about the timely management of DLBCL and patient’s survival with COVID-19 and its related complication. Haematological malignancy such as lymphomas, leukaemias, myelomas cause severe myelosuppression and lymphodepletion increasing the risk for development of COVID-19. Studies have shown that patients with malignancy had an estimated two-fold increased risk of contracting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) than the general population. The survival rates strongly depend on COVID-19 stage and other factors such as immune (neutropenia) status and systemic inflammation.

A randomized phase II trial of carboplatin with or without nivolumab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Background: Platinum agents induce DNA crosslinking and cause accumulation of genotoxic stress, which leads to immune activation via IFN-γ signaling, making the combination with nivolumab (PD-1 antibody) an attractive strategy to enhance the benefit of either agent alone in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Methods: In this phase II open-label, investigator-initiated, multicenter trial, patients with unresectable locally advanced or mTNBC treated with 0-1 prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting were randomized 1:1 to carboplatin (AUC 6) with or without nivolumab (360 mg) IV every 3 weeks. Stratification factors included: germline BRCA (gBRCA) status, prior neo/adjuvant platinum, and number of prior lines of metastatic therapy. After approval of PD-L1 inhibition for mTNBC, the study was amended to include first-line mTNBC only and PD-L1 status was added as a stratification factor. Patients randomized to carboplatin alone were allowed to crossover at progression to receive nivolumab (+ nab-paclitaxel post-amendment). The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 criteria of carboplatin with or without nivolumab in first-line mTNBC in the S intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Key secondary objectives were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate, and duration and time to objective response. PD-L1 status was confirmed centrally using the SP142 Ventana assay (positive, ≥1% IC). Paired researchbiopsies at baseline, on-treatment and at progression were performed, if safely accessible. The trial closed to accrual prior to reaching target accrual due to approval of PD-1 inhibition in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for PD-L1+ mTNBC. Results: Between 1/30/2018 and 12/9/2020, 78 patients enrolled. Three patients did not receive protocol treatment, and the safety analysis was conducted among the 75 that received any treatment;37 received carboplatin + nivolumab (Arm A), 38 received carboplatin alone (Arm B). Median age was 59.1 yrs (range: 25.4-75.8). Four patients (5.3%) had a known gBRCA1/2 mutation. Sixty-two (82.7%) patients received 0 prior lines (ITT population) and 13 (17.3%) 1 prior line of metastatic therapy. Sixty-seven patients (89.3%) experienced any grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse event (AE). The most frequent AE were platelet count decrease (n=40;53.3%), anemia (n=36;48.0%), neutrophil count decrease (n=33;44.0%) and fatigue (n=24;32.0%). Grade 3/4 AE were observed in 46 (61.3%) patients, and there was one grade 5 AE (COVID19 pneumonia). Any grade ≥2 immune-related AE (irAE) were observed in 25 of the 37 (67.6%) patients treated with carboplatin + nivolumab. Grade 3/4 irAE were observed in 11 (29.7%) patients. In the ITT population (32 on Arm A;30 on Arm B), median PFS was 4.2 months with carboplatin + nivolumab, and 5.5 months with carboplatin (stratified HR 0.98, 95% CI [0.51-1.88];p=0.95). ORR was 25% vs. 23.3%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, median OS was 17.5 months vs. 10.7 months (stratified HR 0.63, 95% CI [0.32-1.24];p=0.18). In patients with PD-L1+ mTNBC (13 on Arm A;11 on Arm B), median PFS was 8.3 months and 4.7 months, respectively (stratified HR 0.63, 95% CI [0.21-1.89];p=0.41). ORR was 23.1% vs. 27.3%, respectively. Median OS was 17.5 months vs. 9.6 months (stratified HR 0.59, 95% CI [0.20-1.75];p=0.34). Conclusions: Addition of nivolumab to carboplatin in patients with previously untreated mTNBC, unselected by PD-L1 status, did not significantly improve PFS. A trend toward improved PFS and OS was observed in patients with PD-L1+ mTNBC. Tissue, blood and intestinal microbiome biomarker analyses are planned;bulk tumor and single-cell sequencing, and TCR sequencing in peripheral blood are ongoing.

CARBOPLATIN-PACLITAXEL INDUCED ACUTE MULTI-VESSEL CORONARY THROMBOSIS

Background: Delayed cancer screenings during COVID-19 pandemic are expected to increase use of chemotherapy agents like paclitaxel. Paclitaxel has been implicated in rare cases of acute myocardial infarction from chemotoxicity. We present a rare case and literature review of Paclitaxel-induced acute multiple vessel coronary thrombosis in absence of native coronary artery atherosclerosis. Case: A 68-year-old man with a history of metastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, normal baseline left ventricular systolic function and without coronary disease on recent heart catheterization, was found unresponsive with telemetry showing monomorphic ventricular tachycardia six hours post Carboplatin-Paclitaxel infusion. Decision-making: The patient was emergently cardioverted at bedside, intubated, and started on amiodarone, lidocaine, and norepinephrine infusions. The patient was thrombocytopenic at 61K, leukopenic at 1.2K, and anemic at 7.1 with INR of 1.8. ECG showed new ST-elevation in inferior leads. Bedside echocardiogram revealed global hypokinesis with apical akinesis and a newly reduced LVEF 25%. Troponin measured 0.5 ng/mL (normal <0.04 ng/mL), creatinine 1.4, K+ 3.4, and Mg2+ 1.8. After cardio-oncology led multidisciplinary discussion, a decision was made to pursue invasive angiogram. Found to have de novo triple-vessel coronary thrombosis in mid-LAD, proximal OM1 and mid RCA (Figure 2), percutaneous intervention was performed with drug-eluting stents placed in mid-LAD and mid-RCA, with staged PCI planned on proximal OM1 if needed. Patient responded well to the intervention and was extubated the same day. Patient remained medically stable at 3-month follow-up despite continued chemotherapy. Staged PCI to OM1 was not needed. Conclusion: Paclitaxel based therapy can cause ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death secondary to acute multi-vessel coronary thrombosis in patients without underlying coronary artery disease in the setting of pronounced thrombocytopenia. Prompt recognition of this severe adverse effect and timely utilization of multidisciplinary care models led by a cardio-oncologist achieves optimal outcomes.

Results of darbepoetin alfa treatment of anaemia in chemotherapy-receiving early breast cancer patients - one-centre retrospective observational study

Goals: ESA are recombinant human erythropoietin preparations which stimulate bone marrow to produce RBC. Apart from relieving anaemia symptoms, the application of ESA can prevent the necessity of the red blood cells transfusion in patients with CIA and thus avoid transfusion-related complications. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the absence of the necessity of hospitalization to transfuse blood products presents an additional value. The aim of the study is to assess the results of the application of darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anaemia in pts undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for EBC. Methods: A retrospective assessmentwas carried out of the results of darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) treatment of 98 pts receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for EBC in the National Institute of Oncology in Poland in whom therapy was initiated in the period from 02 January 2019 to 16 February 2020. The drug was given to symptomatic anaemia patients, with a haemoglobin (Hb) level of 8–11 g/dL. In addition, it was also applied in chemotherapy-undergoing patients, with asymptomatic anaemia, with a haemoglobin concentration of <8 g/dL. The treatment was continued until a stable Hb level was reached ensuring the security of further oncological treatment without the necessity of RBC transfusion or termination of chemotherapy. Results: The results of darbepoetin alfa treatment were assessed in a group of 98 subsequent pts, in the course of neadjuvant chemotherapy for EBC. The pts received the following chemotherapy regimens: AC/PCL (35%), AC/PCL + carboplatin (9%), TCH (33%), TCH-P (8%), other (15%). At the moment of the initiation of ESA administration, 18% pts were aged 65 or more (max 76) while 82% below 65 yrs. of age (min 28). In the majority (90) of pts the number of Aranesp® doses administered did not exceed 3, only 8 received 4 doses. The estimated effectiveness in the <65 vs ≥65 years of age groups was 84.8% vs 79.8%, respectively. The estimated effectiveness values in the following BMI-dependent groups, namely: underweight + normal weight (BMI: 16–24.99), overweight (BMI 25–29.99) and obesity (BMI 30–43.1), were 86.3%, 76.6% and 72.0%, respectively. Conclusion(s): Darbepoetin alfa proved effective in the treatment of anaemia in chemotherapy-treated pts for EBC. The response to the treatment in the assessed group of pts was 85.7% There were no statistically significant age and BMI-related differences in ESA effectiveness. No significant side effects of darbepoetin alfa therapy were observed. Conflict of Interest: No significant relationships.

Vinblastine monotherapy induction prior to radiotherapy for patients with intracranial germinoma during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Patients with localized intracranial germinoma have excellent survival. Reducing treatment burden and long-term sequelae is a priority. Intensive inpatient chemotherapy (e.g., carboPEI = carboplatin/etoposide/ifosfamide) has been effectively employed to reduce radiotherapy treatment volume/dose. Outpatient-based carboplatin monotherapy is associated with excellent outcomes in metastatic testicular seminoma (an identical pathology), and successful vinblastine monotherapy induction (with 77% tumor volume reduction after just two weekly vinblastine doses) has recently been reported in an intracranial germinoma patient. METHODS: Adapted UK guidelines for germ cell tumor management were distributed during the COVID-19 pandemic, including nonstandard treatment options to reduce hospital visits and/or admissions. This included vinblastine monotherapy for intracranial germinoma (6 mg/m2 intravenously, or 4 mg/m2 for moderate count suppression, delivered weekly). We describe two such patients treated using this approach. RESULTS: A 30-year-old male with a localized pineal tumor received 12-week vinblastine induction, with >60% volume reduction, prior to definitive radiotherapy. A 12-year-old female with a metastatic suprasellar tumor and progression at all sites of disease whilst awaiting proton radiotherapy received two vinblastine doses with good early response, including 36% primary tumor volume reduction. The patients tolerated vinblastine well. CONCLUSION: Patients with intracranial germinoma have excellent outcomes, and reduction of late effects remains a priority. The description of vinblastine monotherapy in these intracranial germinoma patients warrants further exploration.

Synthesis and characterization of novel organo-hydrogel based agar, glycerol and peppermint oil as a natural drug carrier/release material.

The very recent Covid-19 pandemic has made the need to understand biocompatible polymers as support material in drug delivery systems and controlled release clearer, especially for organo-hydrogels. This study aims to synthesize various new polymeric materials called gels, hydrogels, and organo-hydrogels according to the monomer used and to investigate their use as drug release systems. The agar-glycerol (AG) pair was used to synthesize the polymers, N, N, methylene bisacrylamide (MBA, m) and glutaraldehyde (GA, g) were used as cross-linkers and peppermint oil (PmO) was included to obtain the organo-hydrogels. Therefore, one AG gel and two p (AG-m) and p (GA-g) hydrogels were synthesized within the scope of the study. Six different organo-hydrogels based on p(AG-m-PmO) or p (AG-g-PmO) were also synthesized by varying the amount of peppermint oil. Paracetamol and carboplatin were selected as the sample drugs. Synthesized gels, hydrogels and organo-hydrogels were characterized by FTIR and SEM analysis. Additionally, swelling behaviors of the synthesized gels were investigated in different media (ID water, tap water, ethanol, acetone, ethanol/ID water (1:1), acetone/ID water (1:1) and gasoline) and at different pHs. Moreover, it was determined that organo-hydrogels were blood compatible and had antioxidant properties based on hemolysis, blood clotting and antioxidant analysis. Therefore, the release of paracetamol (a known antipyretic-painkiller, recommended and used in the treatment of Covid-19) and carboplatin (widely used in cancer treatment) were studied. Evidently, as the amount of PMO oil increases, the -OH groups in organo-hydrogels will increase and the chemical and physical bonding rates will increase; therefore it was observed that increasing peppermint oil in the organo-hydrogels structure to 0.3 mL stimulated the release of the drugs. For instance, maximum paracetamol release amount from p(AG-g-PmO) and p(AG-m-PmO) organo-hydrogels was calculated to be 72.3% at pH 7.4 and 69.8% at pH 2.0, respectively. The maximum carboplatin release amount from p(AG-g-PmO) and p(AG-m-PmO) organo-hydrogels was calculated to be 99.7% at pH 7.4 and 100% at pH 7.4, respectively. It was concluded that the synthesized organo-hydrogels might easily be used as drug carrier and controlled drug release materials.